[ad_1]
Bates, H. W. XXXII. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond 23, 495–566 (1862).
Müller, F. Ituna and thyridia: A exceptional case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1879, 20–29 (1879).
Baxter, S. W. et al. Convergent evolution within the genetic foundation of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Genetics 180, 1567–1577 (2008).
Sheppard, P. M., Turner, J. R. G., Brown, Ok., Benson, W. & Singer, M. Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 308, 433–610 (1985).
Mallet, J. & Gilbert, L. E. Jr. Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations between habitat, behaviour and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 55, 159–180 (1995).
Brower, A. V. Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: A phylogenetic speculation from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50, 195–221 (1996).
Wilson, J. S. et al. North American velvet ants kind one of many world’s largest identified Müllerian mimicry complexes. Curr. Biol. 25, R704–R706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.053 (2015).
Wilson, J. S., Williams, Ok. A., Forister, M. L., Von Dohlen, C. D. & Pitts, J. P. Repeated evolution in overlapping mimicry rings amongst North American velvet ants. Nat. Commun. 3, 1272 (2012).
Wilson, J. S., Pan, A. D., Limb, E. S. & Williams, Ok. A. Comparability of African and North American velvet ant mimicry complexes: One other instance of Africa because the ‘odd man out’. PLoS ONE 13, e0189482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189482 (2018).
Plowright, R. & Owen, R. E. The evolutionary significance of bumble bee colour patterns: A mimetic interpretation. Evolution 34, 622–637 (1980).
Williams, P. The distribution of bumblebee color patterns worldwide: Doable significance for thermoregulation, crypsis, and warning mimicry. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 92, 97–118 (2007).
Hines, H. M. & Williams, P. H. Mimetic color sample evolution within the extremely polymorphic Bombus trifasciatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) species complicated and its comimics. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 166, 805–826 (2012).
Koch, J. B., Rodriguez, J., Pitts, J. P. & Unusual, J. P. Phylogeny and inhabitants genetic analyses reveals cryptic speciation within the Bombus fervidus species complicated (Hymenoptera: Apidae). PLoS ONE 13, e0207080 (2018).
Ezray, B. D., Wham, D. C., Hill, C. E. & Hines, H. M. Unsupervised machine studying reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees happen alongside a perceptual continuum. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191501 (2019).
Bateson, W. The alleged “Aggressive Mimicry” of volucellæ. Nature 46, 585 (1892).
Poulton, E. B. The volucellœ as alleged examples of variation “virtually distinctive amongst animals”. Nature 47, 126 (1892).
Cockerell, T. D. New social bees. Psyche A J. Entomol. 24, 120–128 (1917).
Koch, J., Unusual, J. & Williams, P. In: Bumble bees of the western United States (US Forest Service, San Francisco California, 2012).
Williams, P. H., Thorp, R. W., Richardson, L. L. & Colla, S. R. In: Bumble bees of North America: An identification information Vol. 87 (Princeton College Press, Princeton, 2014).
Ruxton, G. D., Franks, D. W., Balogh, A. C. & Leimar, O. Evolutionary implications of the type of predator generalization for aposematic alerts and mimicry in prey. Evol Int. J. Org. Evol. 62, 2913–2921 (2008).
Rowe, C., Lindström, L. & Lyytinen, A. The significance of sample similarity between Müllerian mimics in predator avoidance studying. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 271, 407–413 (2004).
Beatty, C. D., Beirinckx, Ok. & Sherratt, T. N. The evolution of Müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities. Nature 431, 63 (2004).
Chittka, L. & Osorio, D. Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry. PLoS Biol. 5, e339 (2007).
Dittrigh, W., Gilbert, F., Inexperienced, P., McGregor, P. & Grewcock, D. Imperfect mimicry: A pigeon’s perspective. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 251, 195–200 (1993).
Sherratt, T. N., Whissell, E., Webster, R. & Kikuchi, D. W. Hierarchical overshadowing of stimuli and its position in mimicry evolution. Anim. Behav. 108, 73–79 (2015).
Beatty, C. D., Bain, R. S. & Sherratt, T. N. The evolution of aggregation in worthwhile and unprofitable prey. Anim. Behav. 70, 199–208 (2005).
Kazemi, B., Gamberale-Stille, G., Tullberg, B. S. & Leimar, O. Stimulus salience as an evidence for imperfect mimicry. Curr. Biol. 24, 965–969 (2014).
Kikuchi, D. W., Dornhaus, A., Gopeechund, V. & Sherratt, T. N. Sign categorization by foraging animals relies on ecological variety. Elife. 8, e43965 (2019).
Rapti, Z., Duennes, M. A. & Cameron, S. A. Defining the color sample phenotype in bumble bees (Bombus): A brand new mannequin for evo devo. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 113, 384–404 (2014).
Wilson, J. S., Sidwell, J. S., Forister, M. L., Williams, Ok. A. & Pitts, J. P. Thistledown velvet ants within the desert mimicry ring and the evolution of white coloration: Müllerian mimicry, camouflage and thermal ecology. Biol. Lett. 16, 20200242 (2020).
Ascher, J. & Pickering, J. Uncover Life bee species information and world guidelines (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) (2019).
iNaturalist. Obtainable from https://www.inaturalist.org. Accessed [2022].
Bombus Latreille, 1802 in GBIF Secretariat (2021). GBIF Spine Taxonomy. Guidelines dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed by way of GBIF.org on 2021-12-03.
[ad_2]
Comments are closed.